//
you're reading...
headlines, intel, media watch, national politics, others, products, propaganda

incoherency creates divisions:how the pro-establishment media and actors start to ask questions of what really happened or not on the Osama’s Great Raid


Well, I guess I am coming off to be proved as correct,again,yes,does sound a teeny bitty egoistic or self-congratulatory, as one might put it, but it does seem there are divisions and uncertainties as to what really might have, or not, happened, during the great Osama’s Raid in Pakistan.

The Times, UK-Murdoch owned newspaper (means unreliable and has own personal motives for stories) today has around four articles dedicated to the questioning of what really might have happened;

Article 1: headed ”US and Pakistan in fight over Bin Laden family”, notes how;

”The family of Osama bin Laden are at the centre of a diplomatic conflict between Pakistan and the United States, which wants to question his three wives about al-Qaeda and his Pakistani sympathisers. The White House is also worried that more stories will emerge from the family members that could undermine the official version.”

(The Critical Statement is: The White House is also worried that more stories will emerge from the family members that could undermine the official version.)

Article 2: headed: ”He died in 2001: The conspiracy theories about ‘CIA agent Osama’

(Not really a factual, but more conspiratorial-intended, either to discredit others questioning or just either ‘to discredit others stories’, same coin).

Article 3: by Ben MacIntyre ”The truth will out. Obama should know this”

Article 4: on the Life Section ”Conspiracy theories abound… Osama bin Laden: have we bin had?”

(again, spreading the ‘conspiracy judgement” of what might come as a challenge to the official story).

And there are more stories and articles from the mainstream press to independent alternative sources, social media networks and so forth. The waves are gaining strength, but now the question is why?

+ Is it the need to bring down Obama and Democrats?
+ Is it because they have found many inconsistencies and incoherencies within the official stories, (yep, stories), as these seems to be changing every coming days, after the first-on-high three days post-the-raid; from who was there? to who knew what? to what happened? to who was armed or not? to was the intelligence accurate? to the size of the raiding force/team involved? to so forth and forth?

I reckon more and more will come to my ‘questioning’ side, ad will demand the truth, and I reckon, the truth might come from the team it self, say anything about the barbaric and blood-thirsting nature of our special forces in the west, one thing is for sure, they are ‘idealist’ for those who have served beside them, part of them, or just worked with them on a task, they will know these people have the highest common good integrity, public loyalty and as stated democratic idealists, hence you find when governments manipulate facts they ‘talk/leak’ the truth, as it happened here in UK with the expenses scandals and other resignations, as a result of failure of Labour Government to equip the frontline forces in Afghanistan with helicopters, body armours and other defensive platforms, and so forth.

THE TRUTH WILL COME OUT. WHATEVER THE REASONS BEHIND IT, WE WILL KNOW SOONER OR LATER THAT OSAMA WAS NOT KILLED IN THE RAID, BUT RATHER FOUND WAS EVIDENCE OF HIS LONG-TIME AGO DEATH!!!

Advertisements

About s.s.salim: Geopolitical Analyst

Political & Strategy Defence & Security Intelligence & Communications

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: